Michael Grieve

Check out his No Love Lost portfolio!

Thesis Proposal Board

 

This is the first draft of my thesis project.

Defining Urban Sites

Based on the essay “Defining Urban Sites” by Andrea Kahn

This essay speaks of urban sites and how they should be considered within the context of a city. The author makes the case that in order to understand the impact of a project (she is referring to an urban scale project throughout the essay) the boundaries of the site must be re-understood as something far outside the property lines. She discusses two examples to clarify her point, the Palmanuova plan and a sketch by da Vinci of Milan. In the Palmanuova plan, the city is drawn as “a fixed object in an open field.” The boundaries are clearly defined and nothing is left to interpretation. In the drawing by Leonardo da Vinci, nothing is defined. The city is defined by its interrelations, not by the edge. This is how sites need to be read.

“[The site] realities are constituted through the experience of radically shifting programs in constant interaction.” In other words a site is defined by its context. This is, of course, is referring to context outside of the buildings next to a site or in the same neighborhood. This is where mapping comes into play as a useful tool. Mapping allows you to reveal different layers of information individually and then use the analysis to define the site boundaries. The importance of mapping comes in discovering those things that are not found on a map.

Once this information is discovered, the site can be defined. Once a designer understands “the city in the site” the project will inherently be site specific. The project is founded on the understanding of the site and context; therefore the project would be different if it were done in a different site.

The criticism for the essay comes when she separates the architectural site from the urban site. She speaks in this essay almost exclusively about urban design sites but the two scales are intrinsically linked. All of what is discussed in terms of bringing elements of the city into the site and extending the site outside its boundaries are applicable to architectural sites as well. Many architectural projects are lacking because they don’t understand the context and to separate the urban from architectural is to progress these types of projects.

Trace Concepts

based on the essay “Four Trace Concepts in Landscape Architecture” by Christophe Girot

In this essay, Girot explains his four methods of understanding a landscape or site. Each takes place at a different stage of visiting a site and each successively buries deeper into understanding the place. What is important about this method and why it should be done is stated on page two of the article. “…A designer seldom belongs to the place in which he or she is asked to intervene.” This method is designed in order to help one establish his or her sense of the place even though it is foreign to them.

First is “Landing” and is the initial perception of the site. As he says it “invokes the passage from the unknown to the known.” One thing that is also crucial to landing is whether the site is approached “properly” or “improperly.” This is important to how you will later understand the landscape and how the building will eventually be sited.

Second is “Grounding” and is similar to landing although this can occur more than once. Grounding is based on research and analysis of the site and builds off that first impression of the landing. It is about uncovering the multiple layers of a site to read the history, ecology and context.

Third is “Finding” and is about discovery. It has to do with finding that one aspect of the site that makes it unique. Then that unique feature can be used to drive the site strategy. When I read this I immediately thought of the Getty Center and how Richard Meier used the two crests of the hills as guidelines for the rest of the project.

And finally fourth is “Founding” and is based on taking what you learned from the previous four methods and formulating a reaction based on that information. It is about creating a project that is specific to the place because you are basing the project on information that was directly collected from the place.

What I find interesting about these four terms, landing, grounding, finding and founding, is that they could also be used to describe how a building meets the landscape. Landing being an object lightly touching the surface, grounding being a building that interacts with the land but not to the extent of mutating it, finding being a building as ruin or something that is “found” within the landscape and then founding as a traditional building simply hitting the ground like a brownstone in Boston.